Antiplatelet therapy: aspirin
The ELN guideline recommends all eligible patients with PV should be managed with
low‑dose aspirin3
Aspirin is not licensed for use in PV.
- Aspirin reduces the rate of
platelet formation in artery walls2
- The ECLAP study (N=518) showed that
aspirin significantly lowered the risk of the primary composite endpoint of CV
death, non-fatal
MI, non-fatal stroke and major VTE versus placebo9‡
- Adverse events include bleeding,
gastric intolerance and heartburn2,10
Anticoagulant medications
- A 2015 study demonstrated that
anticoagulant (VKA) treatment reduced risk of thrombotic recurrence without a significant effect
on major bleeding, compared with no VKA11
- Nevertheless, major bleeding
remains a possible adverse event and a clinical risk that must be factored
into decision‑making12
‡European Collaboration on Low-Dose Aspirin in Polycythemia Vera (ECLAP) was a
double‑blind,
placebo‑controlled, randomised clinical study evaluating the efficacy and safety of
prophylactic
low‑dose aspirin in patients with PV. Patients without a clear indication or contraindications
to
aspirin were enrolled (N=518); the median age was 61 years and the mean duration of follow‑up
was
about 3 years. Aspirin significantly lowered the risk of a primary composite endpoint, including CV
death, non‑fatal MI, non‑fatal stroke and major VTE, versus placebo (3.2% vs 7.9%;
relative risk:
0.40; 95% CI: 0.18‑0.91; p=0.03). The rate of major bleeding events was not significantly
different
for aspirin versus placebo (1.2% vs 0.8%; relative risk: 1.62; 95% CI: 0.27‑9.71).
Low‑dose aspirin
remains standard therapy for all patients with PV.9
All eligible patients with PV should be managed with phlebotomy together
with daily low dose aspirin3,13
- Targeting HCT <45% reduces
thrombosis risk and is recommended by the ELN and
BSH guidelines5,13
- A volume of blood is drawn at
regular intervals - initially every other day or twice
per week, until the haematocrit target is reached10,14
Advantages
May reduce HCT concentration to normal within weeks
or months2
May ease PV-related symptoms, such as headaches, ringing in the ears
and dizziness2
Disadvantages
Phlebotomy is generally unsuitable for long-term treatment; a
≥15‑year follow‑up analysis found it increases the risk of early
progression to myelofibrosis with myeloid splenomegaly15
Iron deficiency can develop in patients who receive phlebotomies over
a long period of time2
Phlebotomy dependence is one of the independent risk factors
for thrombosis.16 See
more
Phlebotomy can result in abnormal RBC morphology and cause
reactive thrombocytosis symptoms10
Cytoreductive therapies
Cytoreductive therapies should be considered for high-risk patients with PV (aged ≥60
years
and/or
history of PV‑related thrombosis) and may also be considered for low‑risk patients
(any age):13,17
- with progressively
increasing splenomegaly
- with progressively increasing
leucocyte and platelet counts
- who do not
tolerate phlebotomy
About hydroxyurea (HU)
- Targets
multiple
areas of haematologic overproduction by inhibiting ribonucleotide
reductase, which
prevents DNA synthesis5,10
- May reduce HCT
concentration and platelet count2
-
Is the most commonly used first‑line cytoreductive therapy in patients
with PV18
-
In the PVSG study (N=51), HU was compared retrospectively with phlebotomy alone
in 194 patients. HU led to a reduction in thrombotic events (9.8% vs 32.8% in the
phlebotomy group; p=0.009)18
- Hydroxyurea should be
used with caution in younger patients13
Adverse events
Adverse events include, but are not limited to, macrocytosis, myelosuppression, ulceration
in perimalleolar areas, oral aphthous ulceration, actinic keratosis, squamous cell cancer
and other skin lesions, as well as gastrointestinal side effects.5
Intolerance and resistance
- Although HU is generally
well tolerated,5 intolerance may affect 1 in
8 people19
- 1 in 9 patients
develop resistance to HU19
-
Resistance to HU is associated with an approximately 5.6-fold increase in risk of
death (95% CI: 2.7-11.9; p<0.001)19
- Monitoring resistance and
intolerance criteria is important to inform when a change of therapy is needed19,20
Visit module 2 of this series to learn more about HU resistance and intolerance
About IFN‑alfa
- Not licensed for
PV21
- Directly
inhibits
fibroblast progenitor cells and suppresses proliferation of haematopoietic
progenitors21
- Has demonstrated
efficacy
in normalising blood counts, treating splenomegaly, preventing thrombosis and treating
pruritus in patients with PV5
Adverse events and tolerability
- Adverse events include
flu-like symptoms, fatigue, depression, musculoskeletal pain, changes in mood, anxiety,
injection site reaction, gastrointestinal toxicity (nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea) and
weight loss21
About pegIFN‑alfa
- Modified IFN with PEG
chain attached, with a longer half-life than IFN‑alfa22
- Less frequent
administration and better tolerability versus IFN‑alfa (latter applies to
pegIFN‑alfa-2a)5,23
- Has demonstrated
efficacy in normalising myeloproliferation and preventing
thrombosis3
- Off-label in patients
with PV that are intolerant or resistant to hydroxyurea22
Adverse events and tolerability
- The most frequent grade 3
or 4 toxicity with pegIFN‑alfa-2a is neutropenia. Other adverse events reported
include
infection, diarrhoea, depression and elevated liver function tests23
- PegIFN‑alfa-2b shares
similarities with unmodified IFN‑alfa;21 side effects
include fatigue, injection site
reaction, flu-like symptoms, headache, myalgia, depression, insomnia, alopecia and weight
loss24
About ropegIFN alfa‑2b
- Indicated as
monotherapy in adults with PV without symptomatic splenomegaly26
- May be considered more
frequently for younger patients27
- Has
demonstrated
complete haematological responses in 71% of patients with PV and sustained
reductions (19.7%)
in mutation burden of JAK2 V617F from baseline5,26
- An open-label, phase IIIb extension study (CONTINUATION-PV)
enrolled 171 adult patients with PV who previously completed the PROUD-PV study to
evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of ropegIFN alfa-2b. 95 patients
continued to receive ropegIFN alfa-2b (from 50-500 mcg administered subcutaneously
every 2, 3 or 4 weeks). The mean dose after 36 months of treatment (12-month
treatment duration in the PROUD-PV study and 24-month treatment duration in the
extension study) was 363 (±149) mcg for ropegIFN alfa-2b26
Adverse events and tolerability
- The most common adverse
reactions include leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, arthralgia, fatigue, increased
gamma-glutamyltransferase, flu-like illness, myalgia, pyrexia, pruritus, increased alanine
aminotransferase, anaemia, pain in extremity, alopecia, neutropenia, increased aspartate
aminotransferase, headache, diarrhoea, chills, dizziness and injection site
reaction26
Symptom-directed therapies
Pruritus
Patients with PV can suffer from aquagenic pruritus, a debilitating condition characterised by
strong itching, stinging, tingling or burning sensations upon contact with water without visible
changes to the skin:29
- Antihistamines can
be used but are
largely ineffective10
- Topical agents
such as cooling
cream, lidocaine cream, capsaicin or corticosteroids may be
helpful7
- Patients can try to reduce
discomfort by lubricating the skin and minimising bathing7
Splenomegaly
- Indications for splenectomy
include symptomatic portal hypertension, drug‑refractory painful splenomegaly and
frequent
RBC transfusions3
- Adverse events include
portal vein thrombosis, deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary emboli30
- Splenic irradiation is a
palliative treatment for symptoms resulting from splenomegaly, especially discomfort and
mechanical symptoms3,30
- The procedure is typically
reserved for patients who are unable to undergo splenectomy30
- Adverse events include
increased haemoglobin levels and decreased WBC counts31